Tuesday, May 15, 2018

Socialism For Thee, But Not For Me

To cover its own ineptitude, the Seattle city council passed a sizeable tax on large corporations in order to pay for "homeless services and affordable housing".  Hardest hit?  Amazon and Starbucks, two companies known for liberal politics.

First, from Fox News:
A new tax approved by the Seattle City Council has triggered a fierce war of words between the liberal city and its behemoth corporations usually known for their progressive outlook. 

Starbucks and Amazon are now blasting the decision to slap a new “head tax” on businesses to pay for homeless services and affordable housing -- saying the government's own lack of efficiency is to blame for the city’s woes. 

“The city does not have a revenue problem – it has a spending efficiency problem,” Drew Herdener, Amazon vice president, said in a statement. “We are highly uncertain whether the city council’s anti-business positions or its spending inefficiency will change for the better.” 
And next, CNN:
Starbucks was scathing Tuesday in its criticism of the Seattle City Council, which on Monday unanimously passed a controversial tax on big businesses to help fund affordable housing and fight homelessness.

"This City continues to spend without reforming and fail without accountability, while ignoring the plight of hundreds of children sleeping outside. If they cannot provide a warm meal and safe bed to a five year-old child, no one believes they will be able to make housing affordable or address opiate addiction. This City pays more attention to the desires of the owners of illegally parked RVs than families seeking emergency shelter," John Kelly, senior vice president, Global Public Affairs & Social Impact at Starbucks, said in a statement.

The coffee giant is just one of an estimated 585 Seattle-based employers that will be hit by the so-called 'head tax.' Those companies represent about 3% of all Seattle businesses, according to Council estimates, with each bringing in annual revenue of $20 million or more in the city. 
This is an ideal way to run businesses (and jobs) out of your city.  Perhaps the city council has never heard of the story of the goose that laid the golden egg.

On the other hand, it's sort of entertaining to see the companies complain when they have to pay for the socialism and liberal policies they usually support.

3 comments:

Jean said...

Except, of course, in the long run it's the customers who will pay the taxes through higher prices. I get to help pay Seattle taxes too, yay....but then I don't spend a ton on Amazon and I don't go to Starbucks at all.

Mike Thiac said...

“The city does not have a revenue problem – it has a spending efficiency problem,” Drew Herdener, Amazon vice president, said in a statement. “We are highly uncertain whether the city council’s anti-business positions or its spending inefficiency will change for the better.”

Wait, I'm hearing a libtard like this saying government doesn't take in enough, it spends too much. Yo Drew, can you remember that next time a democrat says people like me don't pay my "fair share."

PhillipMarlowe said...

So, where are people wanting to live- Washington state or Oklahoma and Kansas?